JOE

Show Biz

“It just amazes me that the legacy media thinks we’re so stupid that they can just Keep talking about Joe Biden. When [Bozo] talks … it’s not even comparable. I’m not saying that Joe Biden hadn’t aged and was showing signs of slowing down and searching for words… but [Bozo] is like a combination of blackout drunk, full blown dementia, I just ate an edible and I’m a full blown dip-shit all rolled into one.”

Jennifer Wells and Angie Sullivan

So it has recently become fashionable to bash Joe Biden - again.

The campaign to discredit Joe has obviously been orchestrated by Bozo, who will never get over the fact that he lost to Joe in 2020. Almost daily, Bozo posts yet another incoherent rant that would be embarrassing for an ill-mannered two year old – whining about Joe.

Bozo and his propaganda machine have spent millions to try to discredit Joe, and unfortunately the likes of Jake Tapper and David Plouffe have lined up in lock step with the Kremlin generated AI propaganda campaign in a disgusting attempt to attract eyeballs and sell books.

But we again have the self-destructive Dem circular firing squad echoing wing-nut talking points about Joe. What is Tapper thinking, as he outrageously compares an alleged “cover-up” regarding Joe’s mental health to the criminal behavior of Richard Nixon and his “plumbers”??? Begging for eyeballs are we Jake?

What public service is Tapper providing with this effort? Or – more likely -- is he just making a craven attempt to curry favor with the overweight bald guy in pancake makeup and a fright wig?

Here are some undeniable facts. On his worst day, Joe Biden was – and still is - more competent than the criminal sociopath now in the Oval Office. This is not a close call. On his worst day – even today -- the U.S. and the world in general would be better off with Joe in the Oval Office than the convicted felon. For openers, there wouldn’t be a clown car of incompetent nihilists trashing the achievements of the U.S. over the last 200 years while grifting everything in sight.

And the achievements of Joe’s administration are universally acknowledged as the most significant in a generation.¹

Not that there isn’t a lot of room for criticism of Joe’s policies – from genocide in Gaza to “neoliberal” policies , embracing the wealthy and the oligarchs, favoring the 1% and much more.

No question there is a lot to quibble. But Joe’s mental health is hardly worth discussion.

The phrase of the day is “cognitive decline” as it relates to Joe, which is laughable given the advanced dementia Bozo exhibits on a daily basis.

For example, Joe’s debate performance was blown wildly out of proportion by the MSM. No question the optics did not favor Joe. But if the actual content of what came out of Joe’s mouth is compared to what Bozo spewed during that same non-debate, Joe comes out ahead. If you doubt that statement, you can read the full transcript here: https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/27/politics/read-biden-trump-debate-rush-transcript

Seeing the content in print is an eye-opener. Bozo ranted nothing but incoherent gibberish loaded with falsehoods and hate. Without the optics, Joe comes off as brilliant by comparison. It really isn’t a close call. Anyone reading the transcript will probably be shocked at how good Joe looks on paper compared to how bad he looked on screen. The fallout from that “debate” was entirely because of the optics. Proving again that this is show biz. Competence and content have little to do with it.

But it really comes down to a simple calculation. Who would you rather have in the Oval Office right now? Is there any sane person marginally in touch with reality who would prefer the incoherent criminal maniac and his crew of incompetent nut cases to Joe and whoever he would have running his administration? Is that a tough call?

Bozo is clearly suffering from advanced dementia. Where is Jake Tapper on that news? And to use an old phrase from Mad Magazine: “Who’s covering up?” Bozo is actually sitting in the Oval Office displaying incredible brain damage. Who’s covering up now? And isn’t that more important than re-hashing old news about someone who is not in the Oval Office?

The final word on Joe will most likely be closer to a little noticed op-ed by former White House intern Charles Horowitz:

“History sorts signal from noise. The books that matter will not be the ones written to chase a news cycle—they will be written to explain a presidency that helped guide a battered nation through recovery, war, and democratic peril. When they include the metrics we can see even now, that see indicators for everything from manufacturing investment to institutional strength skyrocket with President Biden, the truth will be unavoidable.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-fake-news-no-joe-110000454.html

1